

Key Issues Across Legal, Zoning and Planning Board Site Plan Review


What the Law Requires vs. What Happened
Administrative Decision on Permitted Use
What The Law Requires - Zoning use determinations must be made an administrative office (Building Inspector) and may be appealed to the ZBA (NH RSA 676:5)
1. “What the Law Requires vs. What Happened” (very effective)
Create a short side-by-side section. This is extremely persuasive.
Example:
Law / Ordinance Requirement: Abutters must be given rebuttal opportunity (ZBA Rules Section VII(C)(9))
What Happened: Public comment closed; applicant given rebuttal; abutters denied rebuttal
Law: ZBA must evaluate all 5 variance criteria (RSA 674:33)
What Happened: No findings, no evidence, decision based on “dwelling unit” definition
Law: ZBA limited to variance review or admin appeals (RSA 674:33)
What Happened: Board made its own determination of ordinance applicability
This format is devastating because it removes opinion and shows objective deviation.
What Happened - Building Inspector has not made an administrative decision on permitted use. Instead, the town relied on an "opinion letter" from Town Counsel and Town Engineer, which is not an appealable administrative decision
Permitted Use Requirement
What The Law Requires - Proposed use must be explicitly permitted in the zoning district under the ordinance. If it is not listed, it is not allowed.
What Happened - Commercial lodging is not a permitted use under the Ordinance, yet the application continues to move forward without any board making that determination.
🔹 Role of the ZBA
What the law requires:
The ZBA’s authority is limited to reviewing administrative decisions—it cannot make initial determinations on zoning classifications or permitted uses.
What happened:
The ZBA proceeded without a valid administrative decision before it, effectively acting without proper jurisdiction.
Role of the ZBA
What The Law Requires - Zoning Board must know what
What Happened - Commercial lodging is not a permitted use under the Ordinance, yet the application continues to move forward without any board making that determination.
What the Law Requires vs. What Happened
”Every day, they strive to improve their service to the clients by developing the right blend of technology and creativity to make sure every job done is done as efficiently as possible.”
- Clarice Turner
”Every day, they strive to improve their service to the clients by developing the right blend of technology and creativity to make sure every job done is done as efficiently as possible.”
- Brian Moten


What the Law Requires vs. What Happened
”Every day, they strive to improve their service to the clients by developing the right blend of technology and creativity to make sure every job done is done as efficiently as possible.”
- Clarice Turner
”Every day, they strive to improve their service to the clients by developing the right blend of technology and creativity to make sure every job done is done as efficiently as possible.”
- Brian Moten


What do the Sandown Town Zoning Ordinances Say?
Not an EXPRESSLY PERMITTED USE
Article III, Part A, Section 12 (Building Regulations Pertaining to All Buildings)
"No overnight camp or Motel so-called shall be constructed, except in a site approved by the Board of Selectmen and complying with the regulations of the Building and Zoning Code."
Article II, Part A, Section 14 (General Regulations - Definitions)
"'Dwelling Unit' shall mean rooms with cooking, living, sleeping, and sanitary facilities arranged for the use of one or more individuals living together as a single-family unit."
The subject property is located in the Business District; however, the proposed use of campground-style cabins and transient lodging is not an enumerated permitted or conditional use under Article II of the Sandown Zoning Ordinance. Nor does the use qualify under any residential use classification incorporated through Article I, as it does not meet the definition of a “dwelling unit” under Article II, Part A, Section 14(A), and therefore constitutes a prohibited use absent a valid use variance under RSA 674:33.

